POOJA SHARMA GARIMA GUPTA vs SARITA CHAUHAN CHAIRMAN JKSSB AND ORS. — CPSW/485/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Aug-2017

CNR: JKHC020020532016

Filing Number

CPSW/18887/2016

Filing Date

17-Dec-2016

Registration No

CPSW/485/2016

Registration Date

17-Dec-2016

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POOJA SHARMA GARIMA GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARITA CHAUHAN CHAIRMAN JKSSB AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: Pooja Sharma sought contempt proceedings against Sarita Chauhan and others for violating an August 2016 interim order directing finalization of her selection. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous after finding that the main case was already allowed on April 24, 2018, directing the Board to make recommendations to the Government for issuance of an appointment order in her favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal

  4. 23-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Dec-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/485/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Pooja Sharma sought contempt proceedings against Sarita Chauhan and others for violating an August 2016 interim order directing finalization of her selection. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous after finding that the main case was already allowed on April 24, 2018, directing the Board to make recommendations to the Government for issuance of an appointment order in her favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case