SIKANDER SINGH SANDEEP GUPTA vs UT OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, KANACHAK, JAMMU AND ANOTHER — CRM(M)/365/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020019462026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/513/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/365/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIKANDER SINGH SANDEEP GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, KANACHAK, JAMMU AND ANOTHER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh SekhriView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed petitioner Sikander Singh's petition to quash charge sheet No. 105/2018 based on an amicable settlement reached between him and the complainant (Respondent No. 2), who confirmed she resolved all disputes and had no objections to quashment. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
08-May-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal
-
24-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/365/2026
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed petitioner Sikander Singh's petition to quash charge sheet No. 105/2018 based on an amicable settlement reached between him and the complainant (Respondent No. 2), who confirmed she resolved all disputes and had no objections to quashment. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts