YASH PAUL MOHINDER SINGH vs UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND ANOTHER — CCP(D)/10/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 13th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020018172026
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
CCP(D)/1332/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
CCP(D)/10/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
DB CONTEMPT PETITION COP ( 219 )
Sub-Category
LPA ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YASH PAUL MOHINDER SINGH
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND ANOTHER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
FOR ORDERS Before Notice
FOR ORDERS Before Notice
FOR ORDERS Before Notice
FOR ORDERS Before Notice
FOR ORDERS Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS Before Notice |
| 13-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS Before Notice |
| 11-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS Before Notice |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS Before Notice |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS Before Notice |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Yash Paul's petition as infructuous after the competent authority rejected his claim vide a detailed order dated 12.05.2026, in compliance with a prior Coordinate Bench judgment from 23.10.2017. The court allowed the petitioner to pursue the rejection order through appropriate proceedings if so advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Yash Paul's petition as infructuous after the competent authority rejected his claim vide a detailed order dated 12.05.2026, in compliance with a prior Coordinate Bench judgment from 23.10.2017. The court allowed the petitioner to pursue the rejection order through appropriate proceedings if so advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts