J AND K BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENTRANCE EXAMINATION TH CHAIRPERSON AND ANOTHER RAMAN SHARMA vs JAMMU COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND ORS — LPA/62/2026

Case under Clause 12 Section 1A. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC020017732026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

LPA/1301/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

LPA/62/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DB LPA(OW) ( 201 )

Sub-Category

Other Matters ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Clause 12 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.J AND K BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENTRANCE EXAMINATION TH CHAIRPERSON AND ANOTHER RAMAN SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAMMU COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND ORS

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  3. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh adjourned the case (LPA 62/2026) to 20.07.2026 in the interest of justice. Respondents 1-3 appeared through counsel, but respondent No. 4 failed to appear despite service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh adjourned the case (LPA 62/2026) to 20.07.2026 in the interest of justice. Respondents 1-3 appeared through counsel, but respondent No. 4 failed to appear despite service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case