MUSKAN MEHRA NOW MUSKAN MALIK NIKHIL PADHA vs UT OF J AND K TH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KATHUA AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/786/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Mar-2026

CNR: JKHC020016592026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1220/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/786/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSKAN MEHRA NOW MUSKAN MALIK NIKHIL PADHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KATHUA AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel admitted to attesting documents without verifying them against originals. The counsel undertook to properly verify all future documents before attestation. The court dismissed the petition without ruling on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/786/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel admitted to attesting documents without verifying them against originals. The counsel undertook to properly verify all future documents before attestation. The court dismissed the petition without ruling on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case