MOHD AFZAL SOHIL IRFAAN KHAN vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECETARY POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA — WP(C)/804/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020016502026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1214/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/804/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO LOCAL BODIES INCLUDING AMONGST OTHERS JMC, SMC, BOCA, WATER AND PHE, ELECTRICITY, PDD. ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD AFZAL SOHIL IRFAAN KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECETARY POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA

Case History

  1. 11-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP(C) No. 804/2026, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu adjourned the petition to 22.04.2026. The petitioner argued that the issues raised are covered by earlier Court judgments in similar matters. The AAG sought time to examine whether the case is indeed covered by those precedents before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/804/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP(C) No. 804/2026, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu adjourned the petition to 22.04.2026. The petitioner argued that the issues raised are covered by earlier Court judgments in similar matters. The AAG sought time to examine whether the case is indeed covered by those precedents before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case