M/S TOUCH OF MAGIC SALON AND SPA TH GAGANDEEP KAUR ASHISH SHARMA vs UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/803/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Apr-2026

CNR: JKHC020016322026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1202/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/803/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S TOUCH OF MAGIC SALON AND SPA TH GAGANDEEP KAUR ASHISH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition by directing respondent authorities to inspect M/S Touch of Magic Salon and Spa's operations and, if found compliant with law, refrain from creating impediments to its functioning. The court clarified that this order cannot shield the petitioner from any illegal or unauthorized activities, with both parties agreeing to the disposal at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/803/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition by directing respondent authorities to inspect M/S Touch of Magic Salon and Spa's operations and, if found compliant with law, refrain from creating impediments to its functioning. The court clarified that this order cannot shield the petitioner from any illegal or unauthorized activities, with both parties agreeing to the disposal at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case