M/S KRISHNA TRADERS TH ITS PARTNER AMIT SHARMA AND ANOTHER AMAN BHAGOTRA vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK TH MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP(C)/775/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

Next hearing 30-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020016112026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1182/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/775/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DB OWP ( 215 )

Sub-Category

SARFAESI ACT CASES ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S KRISHNA TRADERS TH ITS PARTNER AMIT SHARMA AND ANOTHER AMAN BHAGOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK TH MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 30-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh admitted the writ petition and adjourned the case to 30.05.2026. Notice was waived for respondents 1-4 and 6-7, while notice to respondent No. 5 is returnable within four weeks with service requisites within one week. The court clarified that pendency of the petition shall not obstruct any authority from completing its proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/775/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh admitted the writ petition and adjourned the case to 30.05.2026. Notice was waived for respondents 1-4 and 6-7, while notice to respondent No. 5 is returnable within four weeks with service requisites within one week. The court clarified that pendency of the petition shall not obstruct any authority from completing its proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case