BIKRAMJIT SINGH M K RAINA vs UNION OF INDIA TH CHIEF GOODS SUPERVISOR. MCTM UDHAMPUR AND ANOTHER — WP(C)/784/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

CNR: JKHC020015872026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1167/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/784/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIKRAMJIT SINGH M K RAINA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA TH CHIEF GOODS SUPERVISOR. MCTM UDHAMPUR AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued a notice to respondents (UOI & another) in response to Bikramjit Singh's petition challenging Notice No. 59/CGS/MCTM/NR/26 dated 10.03.2026, which demanded payment of Rs. 5,87,400/- as outstanding wharfage. The court directed respondents to file their response within four weeks and listed the case for 02.06.2026. Pending adjudication, respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/784/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued a notice to respondents (UOI & another) in response to Bikramjit Singh's petition challenging Notice No. 59/CGS/MCTM/NR/26 dated 10.03.2026, which demanded payment of Rs. 5,87,400/- as outstanding wharfage. The court directed respondents to file their response within four weeks and listed the case for 02.06.2026. Pending adjudication, respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case