AMIR FAROOQ BHATT MOHD ARIF vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA — WP(C)/792/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Next hearing 22-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020015712026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1153/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/792/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIR FAROOQ BHATT MOHD ARIF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents (UT of J&K & Others) returnable within four weeks, with requisites to be filed within two weeks in the writ petition filed by Amir Farooq Bhatt. The case is listed for hearing on 22.05.2026, and the court directed that the pendency of this petition shall not prevent the release of admitted liability payable to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents (UT of J&K & Others) returnable within four weeks, with requisites to be filed within two weeks in the writ petition filed by Amir Farooq Bhatt. The case is listed for hearing on 22.05.2026, and the court directed that the pendency of this petition shall not prevent the release of admitted liability payable to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case