AMIR FAROOQ BHATT MOHD ARIF vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA — WP(C)/781/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020015372026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1128/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/781/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY STATE GOVT. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIR FAROOQ BHATT MOHD ARIF
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition with a direction to respondents to treat it as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for Rs. 17.31 lakhs (balance payment for a completed "One Stop Centre for women" construction project under the BADP Tribal Scheme) within four weeks in accordance with law. Both parties consented to this approach, avoiding a contested judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission Before Notice
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/781/2026
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition with a direction to respondents to treat it as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for Rs. 17.31 lakhs (balance payment for a completed "One Stop Centre for women" construction project under the BADP Tribal Scheme) within four weeks in accordance with law. Both parties consented to this approach, avoiding a contested judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts