AMIR FAROOQ BHATT MOHD ARIF vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA — WP(C) /781/2026

Case under Article 226-section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

CNR: JKHC020015372026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

WP(C) /1128/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /781/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

AMIR FAROOQ BHATT MOHD ARIF

Respondent(s)

UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMAN SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY

01-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition with a direction to respondents to treat it as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for Rs. 17.31 lakhs (balance payment for a completed "One Stop Centre for women" construction project under the BADP Tribal Scheme) within four weeks in accordance with law. Both parties consented to this approach, avoiding a contested judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition with a direction to respondents to treat it as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for Rs. 17.31 lakhs (balance payment for a completed "One Stop Centre for women" construction project under the BADP Tribal Scheme) within four weeks in accordance with law. Both parties consented to this approach, avoiding a contested judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case