MEENAKSHI KALRA AND ANR. R KOUL, ANJEET KOUR vs FAROOQ SHAH SECY.SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ANR. — CPSW/94/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Feb-2018

CNR: JKHC020011772018

Filing Number

CPSW/1030/2018

Filing Date

15-Feb-2018

Registration No

CPSW/94/2018

Registration Date

17-Feb-2018

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEENAKSHI KALRA AND ANR. R KOUL, ANJEET KOUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FAROOQ SHAH SECY.SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' contempt petition seeking enforcement of a March 20, 2017 court order regarding their engagement as ReT teachers. The court found that the School Education Department had properly considered and rejected the petitioners' claims as lacking merit, determining they were not covered under the original court directions and that the recruitment panels had been validly cancelled. Finding no substantive issue remaining, the petition was dismissed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  4. 26-Jul-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan

  5. 24-May-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan Lal

  6. 06-May-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  7. 22-Feb-2022

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan

  8. 04-Dec-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  9. 16-Nov-2021

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

  10. 16-Nov-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  11. 08-Oct-2021

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

  12. 08-Oct-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  13. 13-Sep-2021

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

  14. 13-Sep-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  15. 02-Aug-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  16. 04-Jun-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  17. 07-Apr-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  18. 19-Feb-2021

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  19. 09-Oct-2020

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey

  20. 22-Jul-2020

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  21. 17-Apr-2020

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  22. 25-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

  23. 25-Feb-2020

    For Orders After Notice

    Registrar Judicial

  24. 02-May-2019

    For Filing Statement Of Facts/ Compliance Report

    Registrar Judicial

  25. 11-Mar-2019

    For Filing Statement Of Facts/ Compliance Report

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  26. 13-Aug-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  27. 11-May-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  28. 26-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 15-Feb-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/94/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' contempt petition seeking enforcement of a March 20, 2017 court order regarding their engagement as ReT teachers. The court found that the School Education Department had properly considered and rejected the petitioners' claims as lacking merit, determining they were not covered under the original court directions and that the recruitment panels had been validly cancelled. Finding no substantive issue remaining, the petition was dismissed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case