HARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA vs UT OF J AND K TH REGIONAL DIRECTOR SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS AND OTHERS — CM(M)/67/2026
Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020011572026
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
CM(M)/859/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
CM(M)/67/2026
Registration Date
18-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB PETITIONS U/S 104 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR – CM(M) ( 129 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST A FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL CASES (C)
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH REGIONAL DIRECTOR SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
DEFECTED CASE
DEFECTED CASE
DEFECTED CASE
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | DEFECTED CASE |
| 07-04-2026 | DEFECTED CASE |
| 17-04-2026 | DEFECTED CASE |
| 21-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as withdrawn due to persistent procedural defects (unsigned pages, missing petitioner details, unattested annexures, illegible pages, missing court fees, and incomplete respondent information). Despite granting multiple extensions, the court found the defects so substantial that it declined further time and permitted the petitioners to file a fresh petition within 15 days, free of these deficiencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as withdrawn due to persistent procedural defects (unsigned pages, missing petitioner details, unattested annexures, illegible pages, missing court fees, and incomplete respondent information). Despite granting multiple extensions, the court found the defects so substantial that it declined further time and permitted the petitioners to file a fresh petition within 15 days, free of these deficiencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts