M/S I D SOOD ISPAT PVT. LTD. TH. ITS DIRECTOR RAJ KUMAR GUPTA P R DRORA vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION TH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRM(M)/345/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 10th April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020011052026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/281/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/345/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S I D SOOD ISPAT PVT. LTD. TH. ITS DIRECTOR RAJ KUMAR GUPTA P R DRORA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION TH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by M/S I D Sood Ispat Pvt. Ltd. against the Central Bureau of Investigation as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition. The dismissal was granted on the petitioner's counsel's request, citing that vital documents could not be placed on record during the initial filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Defected Case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
10-Apr-2026
For Admission Before Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh SekhriView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/345/2026
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by M/S I D Sood Ispat Pvt. Ltd. against the Central Bureau of Investigation as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition. The dismissal was granted on the petitioner's counsel's request, citing that vital documents could not be placed on record during the initial filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts