M/S MIRSONS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD TH MOHAMMAD FAROOQ AHMED MIR vs UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP(C) /511/2025

Case under Article 226-section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 01st April 2026.

CNR: JKHC020010442025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

04th March 2025

Filing Number

WP(C) /788/2025

Filing Date

27-02-2025

Registration No

WP(C) /511/2025

Registration Date

03-03-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY CENTRAL GOVT. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

M/S MIRSONS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD TH MOHAMMAD FAROOQ AHMED MIR

Adv. HIMANSHU BEOTRA

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

04-03-2025

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

01-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

23-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

02-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

02-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed M/s Mirsons Constructions Pvt. Ltd.'s writ petition as withdrawn, permitting the petitioner to pursue revocation of its cancelled contract (CA) by submitting a detailed work plan and withdrawing the court case, as per the respondent's communication dated 18.02.2026. The court allowed this withdrawal with liberty for the petitioner to comply with the stated conditions to proceed with the work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed M/s Mirsons Constructions Pvt. Ltd.'s writ petition as withdrawn, permitting the petitioner to pursue revocation of its cancelled contract (CA) by submitting a detailed work plan and withdrawing the court case, as per the respondent's communication dated 18.02.2026. The court allowed this withdrawal with liberty for the petitioner to comply with the stated conditions to proceed with the work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case