SHAKEEL AHMED SHEIKH AND OTHERS SANDEEP GUPTA vs UT OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WOMEN POLICE STATION DOD AND ANOTHERS Advocate - ADARSH BHAGAT — CRM(M)/179/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CNR: JKHC020009612026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/254/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/179/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAKEEL AHMED SHEIKH AND OTHERS SANDEEP GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WOMEN POLICE STATION DOD AND ANOTHERS Advocate - ADARSH BHAGAT
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jul-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
Case Summary: CRM(M) 179/2026 The petition filed by Shakeel Ahmed Sheikh and others against UT of J&K was adjourned. No petitioner appeared in court, while respondent No. 1's counsel was granted four weeks to file objections. The case is listed for hearing on 22.07.2026, and the registry was directed to report on service of respondent No. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
07-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/179/2026
Case Summary: CRM(M) 179/2026 The petition filed by Shakeel Ahmed Sheikh and others against UT of J&K was adjourned. No petitioner appeared in court, while respondent No. 1's counsel was granted four weeks to file objections. The case is listed for hearing on 22.07.2026, and the registry was directed to report on service of respondent No. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts