JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD. TH ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS KARTIKAY SHARMA vs TANU GUPTA — LPA/34/2026

Case under Clause 12 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Feb-2026

CNR: JKHC020007262026

Filing Number

LPA/532/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

LPA/34/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DB LPA(SW) ( 200 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Clause 12 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD. TH ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS KARTIKAY SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TANU GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

    Case Summary: LPA 34/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Jammu and Kashmir Bank's appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment that maternity leave periods must be counted as continuous service for regularization purposes and benefits eligibility. Key Reasoning: The court found that excluding maternity leave from the two-year contractual assessment period constitutes gender discrimination and violates constitutional protections under Articles 14, 15, and 42. The court rejected the bank's acquiescence argument, holding that fundamental rights cannot be waived and that employees facing unequal bargaining power cannot meaningfully consent to exploitative terms. Maternity leave must be treated as a natural incident of employment, not a break in service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  4. 05-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh SekhriView PDF

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LPA 34/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Jammu and Kashmir Bank's appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment that maternity leave periods must be counted as continuous service for regularization purposes and benefits eligibility. Key Reasoning: The court found that excluding maternity leave from the two-year contractual assessment period constitutes gender discrimination and violates constitutional protections under Articles 14, 15, and 42. The court rejected the bank's acquiescence argument, holding that fundamental rights cannot be waived and that employees facing unequal bargaining power cannot meaningfully consent to exploitative terms. Maternity leave must be treated as a natural incident of employment, not a break in service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case