ANIL SINGH ASHOK SHARMA vs UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI, VISHAL SHARMA — WP(C)/325/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th February 2026.
CNR: JKHC020005822026
Filing Number
WP(C)/423/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/325/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
_LAND ACQUISITION AND REQUISITION_ MATTERS ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
16-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL SINGH ASHOK SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI, VISHAL SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir modified its earlier order (16.02.2026) in WP(C) 325/2026 concerning Anil Singh's land dispute with the Union of India and NHAI over an Expressway project. The court deleted the restraining direction that prevented dispossession without land acquisition, accepting the petitioner's submission that the land had already been acquired and was in respondents' possession, while maintaining the direction for the petitioner to pursue arbitration under the National Highway Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
For Admission Before Notice
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/325/2026
Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir modified its earlier order (16.02.2026) in WP(C) 325/2026 concerning Anil Singh's land dispute with the Union of India and NHAI over an Expressway project. The court deleted the restraining direction that prevented dispossession without land acquisition, accepting the petitioner's submission that the land had already been acquired and was in respondents' possession, while maintaining the direction for the petitioner to pursue arbitration under the National Highway Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts