SHAMBU NATH F S BUTT vs M.A.KHAN SECY.FOREST DEPTT.AND ORS. — CPSW/161/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Apr-2017

CNR: JKHC020005132017

Filing Number

CPSW/4061/2017

Filing Date

17-Mar-2017

Registration No

CPSW/161/2017

Registration Date

17-Mar-2017

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMBU NATH F S BUTT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.A.KHAN SECY.FOREST DEPTT.AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of Shambu Nath's petition (CPSW No. 161/2017) as infructuous, finding that nothing substantive remained in the case. The petitioner's counsel fairly conceded this position, leading the Chief Justice to order dismissal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  4. 04-Sep-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal

  5. 03-Jul-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal

  6. 23-Mar-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  7. 30-Nov-2017

    For Orders After Notice

    Lok Adalat

  8. 21-Oct-2017

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal

  9. 20-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/161/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of Shambu Nath's petition (CPSW No. 161/2017) as infructuous, finding that nothing substantive remained in the case. The petitioner's counsel fairly conceded this position, leading the Chief Justice to order dismissal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case