KHALIDA PARVEEN SUDERSHAN SHARMA vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. — CONSW/4/2018
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020003862018
Filing Number
CONSW/320/2018
Filing Date
19-Jan-2018
Registration No
CONSW/4/2018
Registration Date
19-Jan-2018
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 127 )
Sub-Category
SWP ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHALIDA PARVEEN SUDERSHAN SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the restoration application and condonation plea filed by Khalida Parveen for non-prosecution. The original writ petition (SWP No. 1445/2013) was dismissed in 2016, and the restoration applications filed in 2018 remained pending for over eight years without the petitioner appearing to pursue the matter, forcing the court to dismiss for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
-
01-Aug-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan
-
17-Apr-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar
-
02-Feb-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta
-
22-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CONSW/4/2018
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the restoration application and condonation plea filed by Khalida Parveen for non-prosecution. The original writ petition (SWP No. 1445/2013) was dismissed in 2016, and the restoration applications filed in 2018 remained pending for over eight years without the petitioner appearing to pursue the matter, forcing the court to dismiss for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts