BASTI RAM S/O LATE SH. THOTHA RAM ASHOK SHARMA vs STATE OF J AND K THROUGH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE — SWP/394/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Feb-2017

CNR: JKHC020003122017

Filing Number

SWP/2393/2017

Filing Date

21-Feb-2017

Registration No

SWP/394/2017

Registration Date

21-Feb-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASTI RAM S/O LATE SH. THOTHA RAM ASHOK SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF J AND K THROUGH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.MUMTAZ AHMED ADDITIONAL DEPUTY

  4. 4.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)

  5. 5.TEHSILDAR

  6. 6.NIAB TEHSILDAR

  7. 7.FAZAL HUSSAIN S/O DIL MOHD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Basti Ram's petition for non-prosecution after it remained pending for over nine years without the petitioner filing the required affidavit or pursuing the matter. The court inferred the petitioner had abandoned his case challenging the dispensation of his services by order dated April 12, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 22-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/394/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Basti Ram's petition for non-prosecution after it remained pending for over nine years without the petitioner filing the required affidavit or pursuing the matter. The court inferred the petitioner had abandoned his case challenging the dispensation of his services by order dated April 12, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case