AZHARA BATOOL W/O SH JAHANGIR IQBAL BATT AYJAZ LONE vs THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH COMMISSIONER/ SECRETARY TO GOVT., — SWP/338/2017

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Apr-2017

CNR: JKHC020002602017

Filing Number

SWP/1948/2017

Filing Date

16-Feb-2017

Registration No

SWP/338/2017

Registration Date

16-Feb-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AZHARA BATOOL W/O SH JAHANGIR IQBAL BATT AYJAZ LONE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH COMMISSIONER/ SECRETARY TO GOVT.,

  2. 2.STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY FOR INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

  3. 3.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY FOR INTEGRATED WATERSHED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous, finding that the controversy pertained to an Advertisement Notification issued in 2014 and had become time-barred. The court held that by the efflux of time, the petition no longer served any practical purpose and therefore dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 11-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/338/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous, finding that the controversy pertained to an Advertisement Notification issued in 2014 and had become time-barred. The court held that by the efflux of time, the petition no longer served any practical purpose and therefore dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case