ALTAR SINGH M TARIQ MUGHAL vs R.K.GOYAL,SECY.HOME AND ORS. — CPSW/78/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Mar-2017

CNR: JKHC020002502017

Filing Number

CPSW/1766/2017

Filing Date

15-Feb-2017

Registration No

CPSW/78/2017

Registration Date

15-Feb-2017

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALTAR SINGH M TARIQ MUGHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.K.GOYAL,SECY.HOME AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Altar Singh's contempt petition for non-prosecution. Singh had sought contempt proceedings against R.K. Goyal and other authorities for allegedly violating a December 2015 court order directing them to consider his representation before the DIG, Udhampur/Reasi Range. Since the petition remained pending since 2017 with no appearance by Singh's counsel, the Chief Justice dismissed it for lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir

  4. 14-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/78/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Altar Singh's contempt petition for non-prosecution. Singh had sought contempt proceedings against R.K. Goyal and other authorities for allegedly violating a December 2015 court order directing them to consider his representation before the DIG, Udhampur/Reasi Range. Since the petition remained pending since 2017 with no appearance by Singh's counsel, the Chief Justice dismissed it for lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case