HAFIZA BEGUM RAJNESH S PARIHAR vs BABILA RAKWAL DIR.SCHOOL EDU.AND ORS. — CPSW/30/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Feb-2017

CNR: JKHC020001232017

Filing Number

CPSW/599/2017

Filing Date

27-Jan-2017

Registration No

CPSW/30/2017

Registration Date

27-Jan-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAFIZA BEGUM RAJNESH S PARIHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABILA RAKWAL DIR.SCHOOL EDU.AND ORS.

    Adv. SALIQA SHEIKH 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Hafiza Begum against Babila Rakwal (Director, School Education) after the petitioner's advocate stated he did not wish to proceed further. The court declared the petition infructuous and disposed of both the contempt motion and the underlying petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan

  6. 13-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/30/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Hafiza Begum against Babila Rakwal (Director, School Education) after the petitioner's advocate stated he did not wish to proceed further. The court declared the petition infructuous and disposed of both the contempt motion and the underlying petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case