NASEEM AKHTER W/O PARVEZ AHMED N D QAZI vs THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY TO — SWP/26/2017

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Jan-2017

CNR: JKHC020000172017

Filing Number

SWP/60/2017

Filing Date

06-Jan-2017

Registration No

SWP/26/2017

Registration Date

06-Jan-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASEEM AKHTER W/O PARVEZ AHMED N D QAZI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY TO

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT,

  3. 3.DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, ICDS

  4. 4.THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The petition filed by Naseem Akhter against the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Social Welfare Department was dismissed as not pressed on 17.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time and the petitioner did not wish to proceed with it, which the court accepted and dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 10-Jan-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/26/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The petition filed by Naseem Akhter against the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Social Welfare Department was dismissed as not pressed on 17.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time and the petitioner did not wish to proceed with it, which the court accepted and dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case