UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION KHREW (HOME DEPARTMENT) ( NIA ACT) MR. MOHSIN S. QADRI vs MOHAMMAD SHAFI DAR — CrlA(D)/58/2023
Case under National Investigation Agency Act Section 21. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010057782023
e-Filing Number
10-11-2023
Filing Number
CrlA(D)/1420/2023
Filing Date
13-Nov-2023
Registration No
CrlA(D)/58/2023
Registration Date
13-Nov-2023
Judge
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB CRIMINAL APPEAL CRA ( 208 )
Sub-Category
OTHER MATTERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismised
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION KHREW (HOME DEPARTMENT) ( NIA ACT) MR. MOHSIN S. QADRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD SHAFI DAR
Adv. MR ASIF MAQBOOL 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Union Territory's appeal challenging the Special Judge's order releasing a seized truck to respondent Mohammad Shafi Dar. The court found the Special Judge's decision legally sound, noting that protective conditions imposed—requiring non-disposal of the vehicle and production upon demand—adequately addressed prosecution concerns about evidence tampering. Given the vehicle's age, the court saw no purpose in re-seizing it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Arun Palli , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Arun Palli,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
14-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
30-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
30-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
01-Jul-2025
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
22-Apr-2025
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani
-
22-Apr-2025
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani
-
17-Feb-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan,hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
17-Feb-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan,hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
25-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta,hon'ble The Chief Justice Tashi RabstanView PDF
-
25-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta,hon'ble The Chief Justice Tashi RabstanView PDF
-
29-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan,hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
29-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan,hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
22-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul SreedharanView PDF
-
13-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CrlA(D)/58/2023
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Union Territory's appeal challenging the Special Judge's order releasing a seized truck to respondent Mohammad Shafi Dar. The court found the Special Judge's decision legally sound, noting that protective conditions imposed—requiring non-disposal of the vehicle and production upon demand—adequately addressed prosecution concerns about evidence tampering. Given the vehicle's age, the court saw no purpose in re-seizing it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts