ZAMEER AHMAD SHAH MR. WAJID MOHAMMAD HASEEB vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME) — LPA/211/2025

Case under Letters Patent Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010045902025

Filing Number

LPA/3406/2025

Filing Date

01-Sep-2025

Registration No

LPA/211/2025

Registration Date

01-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Bench Type

DIVISION BENCH

Category

DB LPA (HC) ( 203 )

Sub-Category

CASES PERTAINING TO PSA. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ZAMEER AHMAD SHAH MR. WAJID MOHAMMAD HASEEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)

    Adv. MR. ILYAS NAZIR LAWAY 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed Zameer Ahmad Shah's detention order under the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978, finding the detention vitiated due to procedural violations. The court held that authorities failed to communicate the decision on the detainee's representation to him despite rejecting it, violating fundamental procedural safeguards mandated by the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent. The appellant was ordered released immediately unless required in another case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  12. 29-Dec-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  13. 17-Dec-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  17. 15-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  18. 15-Oct-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  19. 06-Oct-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  20. 03-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 01-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/211/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed Zameer Ahmad Shah's detention order under the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978, finding the detention vitiated due to procedural violations. The court held that authorities failed to communicate the decision on the detainee's representation to him despite rejecting it, violating fundamental procedural safeguards mandated by the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent. The appellant was ordered released immediately unless required in another case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case