UBAID GULZAR PANDITH MR. WAJID MOHAMMAD HASEEB, MR. S. T. HUSSAIN SR.ADV. WITH MS. NIDA NAZIR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME) — HCP/274/2025

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010042142025

Filing Number

HCP/1096/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

HCP/274/2025

Registration Date

14-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )

Sub-Category

CASES PERTAINING TO PSA ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226
Indian Penal Code Section 307,341,323,427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UBAID GULZAR PANDITH MR. WAJID MOHAMMAD HASEEB, MR. S. T. HUSSAIN SR.ADV. WITH MS. NIDA NAZIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)

    Adv. MR. MOHSIN QADRI SR. AAG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    HCP/274/2025 Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed the preventive detention order against Ubaid Gulzar Pandith, finding the detention grounds fatally vague and lacking material particulars. The detention order failed to specify identities of alleged anti-national elements, locations of contact, or timeframes, preventing effective representation as mandated by Article 22(5). The court held that vague grounds violate fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21, and vitiates the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. The petitioner was ordered released immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf WaniView PDF

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf WaniView PDF

  9. 31-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  13. 12-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  16. 19-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  17. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  18. 29-Jan-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  19. 27-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  20. 15-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  21. 21-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  22. 31-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  23. 31-Oct-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  24. 30-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

  25. 30-Sep-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  26. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

  27. 19-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. HCP/274/2025

casestatus.in Summary

HCP/274/2025 Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed the preventive detention order against Ubaid Gulzar Pandith, finding the detention grounds fatally vague and lacking material particulars. The detention order failed to specify identities of alleged anti-national elements, locations of contact, or timeframes, preventing effective representation as mandated by Article 22(5). The court held that vague grounds violate fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21, and vitiates the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. The petitioner was ordered released immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case