SAKEENA M/S M. Y. BHAT AND HAMZA PRINCE vs INSHA JAHANGEER AND ANR. — CRM(M)/334/2021

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010039782021

Filing Number

CRM(M)/689/2021

Filing Date

13-Oct-2021

Registration No

CRM(M)/334/2021

Registration Date

13-Oct-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF COMPLAINT. ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAKEENA M/S M. Y. BHAT AND HAMZA PRINCE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INSHA JAHANGEER AND ANR.

  2. 2.MURTAZA ALIAS ALI JAHANGEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed both FIR No.50/2021 (for theft and criminal trespass) and a related criminal complaint, finding the underlying dispute was purely civil regarding property inheritance rights, not criminal in nature. The court determined both parties had leveled false allegations against each other to pressurize the opponent, with police investigation finding no evidence of alleged thefts, and directed parties to pursue their claims exclusively through civil courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

  4. 25-Aug-2023

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  5. 24-May-2023

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  6. 26-Apr-2023

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  7. 28-Dec-2022

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  8. 28-Oct-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  9. 19-Sep-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF

  10. 19-Sep-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  11. 12-Aug-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  12. 29-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  13. 29-Jul-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  14. 18-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  15. 18-Jul-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  16. 31-May-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  17. 05-May-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  18. 05-May-2022

    For Orders(non Fresh)

  19. 05-May-2022

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  20. 10-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  21. 16-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  22. 16-Feb-2022

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  23. 28-Dec-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  24. 28-Dec-2021

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  25. 27-Nov-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  26. 27-Nov-2021

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  27. 02-Nov-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  28. 02-Nov-2021

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  29. 13-Oct-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  30. 13-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 13-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/334/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed both FIR No.50/2021 (for theft and criminal trespass) and a related criminal complaint, finding the underlying dispute was purely civil regarding property inheritance rights, not criminal in nature. The court determined both parties had leveled false allegations against each other to pressurize the opponent, with police investigation finding no evidence of alleged thefts, and directed parties to pursue their claims exclusively through civil courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case