FEHMEEDA BANO MR. BILAL AHMAD MALLA vs GHULAM MOHAMMAD PUJU AND ORS. (SCHOOL EDUCATION) — CCP(S)/311/2024

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11, 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010039762024

Filing Number

CCP(S)/3921/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

CCP(S)/311/2024

Registration Date

07-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11, 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FEHMEEDA BANO MR. BILAL AHMAD MALLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM MOHAMMAD PUJU AND ORS. (SCHOOL EDUCATION)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Case Summary: CCP(S) 311/2024 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir adjourned the case after the respondents asserted that the petitioner's engagement order was withdrawn via Order No. ZEO/SMS/023/3366-70 dated 28 December 2023. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment to amend the writ petition to challenge this withdrawal order. The court closed contempt proceedings after finding that the petitioner had resumed duties pursuant to an earlier interim order dated 26 February 2024 staying the November 2023 abeyance order, and directed respondents to continue paying her remuneration during her employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  9. 04-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

  10. 04-Sep-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  12. 03-Jul-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  13. 29-May-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  14. 01-May-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  15. 24-Apr-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  16. 10-Apr-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  17. 12-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  18. 12-Feb-2025

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  19. 03-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF

  20. 03-Jan-2025

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  21. 09-Dec-2024

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  22. 27-Sep-2024

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  23. 09-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

  24. 09-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CCP(S)/311/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CCP(S) 311/2024 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir adjourned the case after the respondents asserted that the petitioner's engagement order was withdrawn via Order No. ZEO/SMS/023/3366-70 dated 28 December 2023. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment to amend the writ petition to challenge this withdrawal order. The court closed contempt proceedings after finding that the petitioner had resumed duties pursuant to an earlier interim order dated 26 February 2024 staying the November 2023 abeyance order, and directed respondents to continue paying her remuneration during her employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case