BASHIR AHMAD BEIGH MR. WAJID MOHAMMAD HASEEB vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) — HCP/272/2024
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010039392024
Filing Number
HCP/992/2024
Filing Date
05-Aug-2024
Registration No
HCP/272/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )
Sub-Category
CASES PERTAINING TO PSA ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASHIR AHMAD BEIGH MR. WAJID MOHAMMAD HASEEB
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
Case Summary: HCP/272/2024 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed a preventive detention order against Bashir Ahmad Beigh, finding the grounds of detention vague and lacking any specific fresh activities after his release. The court held that while past conduct may be considered, detention must be based on proximate and compelling reasons, requiring reference to specific prejudicial activities necessitating detention—mere reliance on old incidents with a large temporal gap is insufficient to justify preventive custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
12-Feb-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
28-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
26-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
15-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
03-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
19-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
06-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
15-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
17-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
17-Sep-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
19-Aug-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
22-Jul-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
07-Jul-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
31-May-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
05-May-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
08-Apr-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
11-Mar-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
21-Feb-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
03-Feb-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
16-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF
-
16-Dec-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
18-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
25-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
25-Oct-2024
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal
-
24-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF
-
24-Sep-2024
For Orders(non Fresh)
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice
-
07-Aug-2024
Hon'ble The Acting Chief JusticeView PDF
-
07-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. HCP/272/2024
Case Summary: HCP/272/2024 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed a preventive detention order against Bashir Ahmad Beigh, finding the grounds of detention vague and lacking any specific fresh activities after his release. The court held that while past conduct may be considered, detention must be based on proximate and compelling reasons, requiring reference to specific prejudicial activities necessitating detention—mere reliance on old incidents with a large temporal gap is insufficient to justify preventive custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts