GHULAM MOHAMMAD LONE MR. M. A. BEIGH vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT) — WP(C)/1803/2025

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010038272025

Filing Number

WP(C)/2828/2025

Filing Date

29-Jul-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/1803/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RETIRAL BENEFIT ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM MOHAMMAD LONE MR. M. A. BEIGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1803/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the writ petition and set aside the recovery order dated 08.03.2025. The court prohibited the respondents from recovering any amount from the petitioner's pension and retiral benefits, and directed them to process his pension based on his last drawn pay. Key Reasoning: The court held that recovery from a retired employee is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih). Additionally, under J&K Civil Service Rules, the government cannot verify correctness of emoluments beyond 24 months before retirement. Since the petitioner retired in March 2022 and the recovery order was issued in March 2025—nearly three years later—and without prior notice or hearing, the rescission of his 2010 promotion violated both law and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  11. 03-Sep-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1803/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1803/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the writ petition and set aside the recovery order dated 08.03.2025. The court prohibited the respondents from recovering any amount from the petitioner's pension and retiral benefits, and directed them to process his pension based on his last drawn pay. Key Reasoning: The court held that recovery from a retired employee is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih). Additionally, under J&K Civil Service Rules, the government cannot verify correctness of emoluments beyond 24 months before retirement. Since the petitioner retired in March 2022 and the recovery order was issued in March 2025—nearly three years later—and without prior notice or hearing, the rescission of his 2010 promotion violated both law and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case