GHULAM MOHAMMAD LONE MR. M. A. BEIGH vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT) — WP(C)/1803/2025
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010038272025
Filing Number
WP(C)/2828/2025
Filing Date
29-Jul-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/1803/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RETIRAL BENEFIT ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHULAM MOHAMMAD LONE MR. M. A. BEIGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1803/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the writ petition and set aside the recovery order dated 08.03.2025. The court prohibited the respondents from recovering any amount from the petitioner's pension and retiral benefits, and directed them to process his pension based on his last drawn pay. Key Reasoning: The court held that recovery from a retired employee is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih). Additionally, under J&K Civil Service Rules, the government cannot verify correctness of emoluments beyond 24 months before retirement. Since the petitioner retired in March 2022 and the recovery order was issued in March 2025—nearly three years later—and without prior notice or hearing, the rescission of his 2010 promotion violated both law and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
09-Mar-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
19-Nov-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
10-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
03-Sep-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
30-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1803/2025
Case Summary: WP(C) 1803/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the writ petition and set aside the recovery order dated 08.03.2025. The court prohibited the respondents from recovering any amount from the petitioner's pension and retiral benefits, and directed them to process his pension based on his last drawn pay. Key Reasoning: The court held that recovery from a retired employee is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih). Additionally, under J&K Civil Service Rules, the government cannot verify correctness of emoluments beyond 24 months before retirement. Since the petitioner retired in March 2022 and the recovery order was issued in March 2025—nearly three years later—and without prior notice or hearing, the rescission of his 2010 promotion violated both law and natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts