TANVEER AHMAD NAJAR MR. SYED SAJAD GEELANI, SAMI SABIR LONE, FURQAN AKRAM, FAIZAN RASHID, HALEEM LONE vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME) — HCP/248/2025
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010034472025
Filing Number
HCP/913/2025
Filing Date
11-07-2025
Registration No
HCP/248/2025
Registration Date
11-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )
Sub-Category
CASES PERTAINING TO PSA ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismised
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TANVEER AHMAD NAJAR MR. SYED SAJAD GEELANI, SAMI SABIR LONE, FURQAN AKRAM, FAIZAN RASHID, HALEEM LONE
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
FOR FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-07-2025 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 09-04-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 31-03-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Case Summary: HCP No. 248/2025 Court Decision: The High Court dismissed the petition challenging Tanveer Ahmad Najar's preventive detention order under J&K Public Safety Act. Justice Sanjay Dhar upheld the detention, finding specific allegations of the detainee's contact with Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorists via encrypted applications to coordinate terror attacks, despite previously executed peace bonds. The court rejected all grounds, finding detention orders legally valid and procedurally compliant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: HCP No. 248/2025 Court Decision: The High Court dismissed the petition challenging Tanveer Ahmad Najar's preventive detention order under J&K Public Safety Act. Justice Sanjay Dhar upheld the detention, finding specific allegations of the detainee's contact with Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorists via encrypted applications to coordinate terror attacks, despite previously executed peace bonds. The court rejected all grounds, finding detention orders legally valid and procedurally compliant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts