TANVEER AHMAD NAJAR MR. SYED SAJAD GEELANI, SAMI SABIR LONE, FURQAN AKRAM, FAIZAN RASHID, HALEEM LONE vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME) — HCP/248/2025

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010034472025

Filing Number

HCP/913/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

HCP/248/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )

Sub-Category

CASES PERTAINING TO PSA ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANVEER AHMAD NAJAR MR. SYED SAJAD GEELANI, SAMI SABIR LONE, FURQAN AKRAM, FAIZAN RASHID, HALEEM LONE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Case Summary: HCP No. 248/2025 Court Decision: The High Court dismissed the petition challenging Tanveer Ahmad Najar's preventive detention order under J&K Public Safety Act. Justice Sanjay Dhar upheld the detention, finding specific allegations of the detainee's contact with Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorists via encrypted applications to coordinate terror attacks, despite previously executed peace bonds. The court rejected all grounds, finding detention orders legally valid and procedurally compliant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  14. 29-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF

  17. 24-Nov-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul

  18. 31-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF

  19. 31-Oct-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  20. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  21. 10-Oct-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  22. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  23. 19-Sep-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  24. 26-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  25. 26-Aug-2025

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  26. 15-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  27. 15-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. HCP/248/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HCP No. 248/2025 Court Decision: The High Court dismissed the petition challenging Tanveer Ahmad Najar's preventive detention order under J&K Public Safety Act. Justice Sanjay Dhar upheld the detention, finding specific allegations of the detainee's contact with Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorists via encrypted applications to coordinate terror attacks, despite previously executed peace bonds. The court rejected all grounds, finding detention orders legally valid and procedurally compliant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case