UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS / REVENUE) MR. ABDUL RASHID MALIK vs UMAR SHABAN DAR AND ORS. — RP/55/2025

Case under The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 114. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010033882025

e-Filing Number

21-06-2025

Filing Number

RP/2501/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

RP/55/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

DIVISION BENCH

Category

DB REVIEW PETITION RP ( 218 )

Sub-Category

IN OWP ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS / REVENUE) MR. ABDUL RASHID MALIK

  2. 2.FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE JAMMU AND KASHMIR SRINAGAR JAMMU

    Adv. abdul rashid

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT REVENUE DEPARTMENT

    Adv. abdul rashid

  4. 4.DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER KASHMIR

    Adv. abdul rashid

  5. 5.CHIEF ENGINEER PMGSY KASHMIR

    Adv. abdul rashid

  6. 6.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PMGSY CIRCLE SRINAGAR

    Adv. abdul rashid

  7. 7.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ANANTNAG

    Adv. abdul rashid

  8. 8.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER REVENUE COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION ANANTNAG

    Adv. abdul rashid

  9. 9.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PMGSY DIVISION ANANTNAG

    Adv. abdul rashid

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UMAR SHABAN DAR AND ORS.

  2. 2.GHULAM HASSAN BANDROO

  3. 3.RAJA BEGUM

  4. 4.BASHIR AHMED BANDROO

  5. 5.MOHAMMAD KAMAL BADROO

  6. 6.GHULAM MOHAMMAD BHAT

  7. 7.GHULAM NABI BHAT

  8. 8.MOHAMMAD SULTAN RESHI

  9. 9.NAZIR AHMAD BANDROO

  10. 10.ABDUL RASHID DAR

  11. 11.ABDUL RAHIM DAR

  12. 12.NISAR AHMAD DAR

  13. 13.SONAULLAH DAR

  14. 14.ABDUL KHALIQ DAR

  15. 15.GHULAM HASSAN DAR

  16. 16.GHULAM MOHAMMAD DAR

  17. 17.MANZOOR AHMAD WANI

  18. 18.MOHAMMAD JABAR DAR

  19. 19.GHULAM MOHIDEEN DAR

  20. 20.MOHAMMAD KHALIL DAR

  21. 21.GHULAM HASSAN BANDROO

  22. 22.BASHIR AHMAD BANDROO

  23. 23.NISAR AHMAD BANDROO

  24. 24.ARSHID AHMED BANDROO

  25. 25.ABDUL GANI BANDROO

  26. 26.ABDUL RASHID BANDROO

  27. 27.MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH DAR

  28. 28.GHULAM MOHIDEEN DAR

  29. 29.GHULAM NABI BANDROO

  30. 30.KHUMAM BEGUM

  31. 31.ZARIFA BANOO

  32. 32.MST TAJA BEGUM

  33. 33.ZAINA BEGUM

  34. 34.SADA BEGUM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the Union Territory's review petition and recalled the August 2022 order directing fresh land acquisition proceedings and compensation payment for Sultanpora, Bijbehara land. The court found that the Intending Department (PMGSY Kashmir) was improperly excluded as a necessary party to the original writ petition, preventing it from presenting evidence regarding alleged prior private negotiations and compensation payments. The writ petition was restored for reconsideration with the Intending Department now properly impleaded as respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 08-May-2026

    For Orders(non Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  5. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  8. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RP/55/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the Union Territory's review petition and recalled the August 2022 order directing fresh land acquisition proceedings and compensation payment for Sultanpora, Bijbehara land. The court found that the Intending Department (PMGSY Kashmir) was improperly excluded as a necessary party to the original writ petition, preventing it from presenting evidence regarding alleged prior private negotiations and compensation payments. The writ petition was restored for reconsideration with the Intending Department now properly impleaded as respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case