MURTAZA ALIAS ALI JAHANGIR MR. SAJAD AHMAD MIR vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SADDAR AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT) Advocate - MR. SAJAD ASHRAF — CRM(M)/274/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010033272021
Filing Number
CRM(M)/558/2021
Filing Date
08-09-2021
Registration No
CRM(M)/274/2021
Registration Date
08-09-2021
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MURTAZA ALIAS ALI JAHANGIR MR. SAJAD AHMAD MIR
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SADDAR AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT) Advocate - MR. SAJAD ASHRAF
ESHA JAVID
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-09-2021 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 10-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 06-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed FIR No.50/2021 and a related criminal complaint, finding that the dispute over inherited property between family members was essentially civil in nature and that both parties had falsely accused each other to gain criminal leverage. The court held that since the parties were already litigating the property matter in civil court and the police investigation found no substantiation for theft allegations, allowing criminal proceedings would constitute an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed FIR No.50/2021 and a related criminal complaint, finding that the dispute over inherited property between family members was essentially civil in nature and that both parties had falsely accused each other to gain criminal leverage. The court held that since the parties were already litigating the property matter in civil court and the police investigation found no substantiation for theft allegations, allowing criminal proceedings would constitute an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts