VASUKI N KILAM RUAANI AHMAD BABA, FEROZ AHMAD PARRAY vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANOTHER (REVENUE) — WP(C)/1297/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010027472026

Filing Number

WP(C)/2093/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1297/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MIGRANTS' IMMOVABLE PROPERTY PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION ACT., 1997. ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASUKI N KILAM RUAANI AHMAD BABA, FEROZ AHMAD PARRAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANOTHER (REVENUE)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1297/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir directed the District Magistrate, Srinagar to expeditiously dispose of petitioner Vasuki N Kilam's pending property restoration application within three months. The court found that the application's delay since 2024 was adversely affecting the petitioner's property rights and warranted judicial intervention to ensure timely resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1297/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir directed the District Magistrate, Srinagar to expeditiously dispose of petitioner Vasuki N Kilam's pending property restoration application within three months. The court found that the application's delay since 2024 was adversely affecting the petitioner's property rights and warranted judicial intervention to ensure timely resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case