MOHAMMAD SUBHAN YATO S.A.QADIRI vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1289/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010027192026

Filing Number

WP(C)/2072/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1289/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE LAWS ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD SUBHAN YATO S.A.QADIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition, finding no plausible reason to invoke its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, as the matter was already pending before the Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar, Chadoora under Section 270 of BNSS. The court directed the Executive Magistrate to expedite and decide the underlying dispute within three months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition, finding no plausible reason to invoke its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, as the matter was already pending before the Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar, Chadoora under Section 270 of BNSS. The court directed the Executive Magistrate to expedite and decide the underlying dispute within three months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case