IRFAN AHMAD KUTTAY TH.HIS FATHER MR.Z.A.QURESHI vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS — HCP/171/2025
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 20th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010026592025
Filing Number
HCP/646/2025
Filing Date
31-May-2025
Registration No
HCP/171/2025
Registration Date
31-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )
Sub-Category
CASES PERTAINING TO PSA ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismised
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IRFAN AHMAD KUTTAY TH.HIS FATHER MR.Z.A.QURESHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
Case Summary: HCP/171/2025 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir upheld a preventive detention order against Irfan Ahmad Kuttay under the J&K Public Safety Act 1978, rejecting his plea for quashment. The court held that preventive detention and criminal prosecution operate in different spheres—while prior bail in criminal cases doesn't invalidate preventive detention, the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction based on material evidence of the detainee's activities as an over-ground worker (OGW) providing logistic support to terrorists remains valid. The court found no constitutional infirmity, procedural violation, or non-application of mind, noting that all required materials and grounds were properly communicated to the detainee in his understanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
14-May-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
18-Apr-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
09-Apr-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
02-Apr-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
19-Feb-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
06-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
24-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
15-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
10-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
26-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
31-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
03-Oct-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
30-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
30-Sep-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
10-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
20-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
20-Aug-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
14-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
04-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF
-
04-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. HCP/171/2025
Case Summary: HCP/171/2025 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir upheld a preventive detention order against Irfan Ahmad Kuttay under the J&K Public Safety Act 1978, rejecting his plea for quashment. The court held that preventive detention and criminal prosecution operate in different spheres—while prior bail in criminal cases doesn't invalidate preventive detention, the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction based on material evidence of the detainee's activities as an over-ground worker (OGW) providing logistic support to terrorists remains valid. The court found no constitutional infirmity, procedural violation, or non-application of mind, noting that all required materials and grounds were properly communicated to the detainee in his understanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts