MUSHTAQ AHMAD TANTRAY PARVAIZ LONE vs AZMAT HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER — RFA/57/2026

Case under The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 96. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Next hearing 27-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC010026412026

Filing Number

RFA/2009/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

RFA/57/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB CIVIL 1ST APPEAL ( 103 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL 1ST APPEALS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSHTAQ AHMAD TANTRAY PARVAIZ LONE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AZMAT HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Jul-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief JusticeView PDF

    In RFA No. 57/2026, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir admitted two applications: one seeking condonation of 86 days' delay in filing the appeal, and another seeking stay of execution decree. Notices were issued to respondents returnable within four weeks, with service to be effected within two weeks. The court granted conditional stay of execution proceedings subject to deposit of ₹7 lakhs before the Court Registry, with the case listed for 27.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In RFA No. 57/2026, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir admitted two applications: one seeking condonation of 86 days' delay in filing the appeal, and another seeking stay of execution decree. Notices were issued to respondents returnable within four weeks, with service to be effected within two weeks. The court granted conditional stay of execution proceedings subject to deposit of ₹7 lakhs before the Court Registry, with the case listed for 27.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case