AISHA BEGUM AND OTHERS M/S SHEIKH MANZOOR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND OTHERS — CRM(M)/366/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC010026312026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/630/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/366/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AISHA BEGUM AND OTHERS M/S SHEIKH MANZOOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    CRM(M) 366/2026 Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents in a petition challenging FIR No. 107/2026 under Sections 9 and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. The petitioners (mother, brother, and sister-in-law of the main accused) contended they had no involvement in the child marriage. The court allowed investigation to proceed but prohibited filing of challan against petitioners without prior court permission. Case listed for 20.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRM(M) 366/2026 Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents in a petition challenging FIR No. 107/2026 under Sections 9 and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. The petitioners (mother, brother, and sister-in-law of the main accused) contended they had no involvement in the child marriage. The court allowed investigation to proceed but prohibited filing of challan against petitioners without prior court permission. Case listed for 20.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case