MST. SAIMA MS. RUKHSANA KHAN vs KHALID AHMAD BAKAL AND OTHERS — CM(M)/194/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 03rd June 2026.

CNR: JKHC010026182026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CM(M)/1990/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/194/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

QUASHMENT OF ORDER ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

03rd June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

MST. SAIMA MS. RUKHSANA KHAN

Respondent(s)

KHALID AHMAD BAKAL AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY

03-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION FRESH

Orders

03-06-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Mst. Saima's petition challenging a lower court's interim custody order that awarded the younger child (15 months) to the mother and the elder child (5 years) to the father. The court found the petition not maintainable, holding that the petitioner should have pursued a statutory appeal under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, to the Sessions Court, and that a pending guardianship petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, provided an adequate alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Mst. Saima's petition challenging a lower court's interim custody order that awarded the younger child (15 months) to the mother and the elder child (5 years) to the father. The court found the petition not maintainable, holding that the petitioner should have pursued a statutory appeal under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, to the Sessions Court, and that a pending guardianship petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, provided an adequate alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case