MAHANT SUBHASH SHAH MR. MOHSIN QADIRI, MR. SOFI MANZOOR vs STATE AND OTHERS (REVENUE) — OWP/1393/2011
Case under Jk Csr, Constitution of India Section 111. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th October 2021.
CNR: JKHC010025762011
Next Hearing
11th September 2016
Filing Number
OWP/1393/2011
Filing Date
03-01-2011
Registration No
OWP/1393/2011
Registration Date
19-10-2011
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
REVENUE LAWS ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
08th October 2021
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHANT SUBHASH SHAH MR. MOHSIN QADIRI, MR. SOFI MANZOOR
Respondent(s)
STATE AND OTHERS (REVENUE)
Adv. MR. S. D. TANTARY,MR. N. H. SHAH,MR. S. D. TANTARY,MR. N. H. SHAH,MR. S. D. TANTARY,MR. N. H. SHAH,MR. S. D. TANTARY,MR. M.A.RATHORE,MR. M.A.RATHORE,MR. S. D. TANTARY,MR. N. H. SHAH,MR. M.A.RATHORE,MR. M.A.RATHORE,MR. M.A.RATHORE,MR. S. D. TANTARY,MR. N. H. SHAH,MR. M.A.RATHORE,MR. N. H. SHAH 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI
CASE DISPOSED
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
Revoked
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-09-2016 | CASE DISPOSED |
| 30-12-2022 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 30-12-2022 | Revoked |
| 08-10-2021 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
Orders
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
The court found that the petitioner's previous order from 02.12.2025 had not been complied with, as proper service of notice upon respondents 7-9 had not been completed. The court granted one week's additional time to complete the necessary service steps, with the warning that failure to do so would result in automatic dismissal of the application without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found that the petitioner's previous order from 02.12.2025 had not been complied with, as proper service of notice upon respondents 7-9 had not been completed. The court granted one week's additional time to complete the necessary service steps, with the warning that failure to do so would result in automatic dismissal of the application without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts