SAHRISH HASSAN AND ANOTHER MR. A. A. DAR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (POLICE / HOME) — WP(C)/1231/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010025652026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1949/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1231/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHRISH HASSAN AND ANOTHER MR. A. A. DAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (POLICE / HOME)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1231/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition seeking police protection for two adults who contracted marriage against their families' wishes. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal affirmed that majors have the right to marry by choice and police must provide protection if approached, but noted the petitioners had not yet formally approached authorities. The court directed officials to address their grievance for adequate security if they apply, while expressly declining to opine on the marriage's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  5. 30-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1231/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition seeking police protection for two adults who contracted marriage against their families' wishes. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal affirmed that majors have the right to marry by choice and police must provide protection if approached, but noted the petitioners had not yet formally approached authorities. The court directed officials to address their grievance for adequate security if they apply, while expressly declining to opine on the marriage's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case