SAHRISH HASSAN AND ANOTHER MR. A. A. DAR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (POLICE / HOME) — WP(C)/1231/2026
Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st June 2026.
CNR: JKHC010025652026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1949/2026
Filing Date
29-05-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1231/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAHRISH HASSAN AND ANOTHER MR. A. A. DAR
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (POLICE / HOME)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 01-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
Orders
Case Summary: WP(C) 1231/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition seeking police protection for two adults who contracted marriage against their families' wishes. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal affirmed that majors have the right to marry by choice and police must provide protection if approached, but noted the petitioners had not yet formally approached authorities. The court directed officials to address their grievance for adequate security if they apply, while expressly declining to opine on the marriage's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP(C) 1231/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition seeking police protection for two adults who contracted marriage against their families' wishes. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal affirmed that majors have the right to marry by choice and police must provide protection if approached, but noted the petitioners had not yet formally approached authorities. The court directed officials to address their grievance for adequate security if they apply, while expressly declining to opine on the marriage's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts