JAVID AHMAD AHANGER PARVAIZ NAZIR vs ZAFFAR AHMAD BHAT — CM(M)/168/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: JKHC010023412026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1781/2026

Filing Date

16-May-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/168/2026

Registration Date

16-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

PETITION U/S 227 COI ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAVID AHMAD AHANGER PARVAIZ NAZIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZAFFAR AHMAD BHAT

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  3. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Case Summary: CM(M) 168/2026 Javid Ahmad Ahanger v. Zaffar Ahmad Bhat The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir stayed the trial court's impugned order dated 16.03.2026, which had granted the defendant conditional leave to defend a suit under CPC Order 37. The petitioner challenged the order as self-contradictory, arguing the trial court found a substantial defence likely to succeed yet still granted only conditional leave based on admitted facts. Notice was issued to the respondent, case records were summoned, and the matter was adjourned to 3rd June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CM(M)/168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CM(M) 168/2026 Javid Ahmad Ahanger v. Zaffar Ahmad Bhat The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir stayed the trial court's impugned order dated 16.03.2026, which had granted the defendant conditional leave to defend a suit under CPC Order 37. The petitioner challenged the order as self-contradictory, arguing the trial court found a substantial defence likely to succeed yet still granted only conditional leave based on admitted facts. Notice was issued to the respondent, case records were summoned, and the matter was adjourned to 3rd June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case