NAZILA FAYAZ MIR AND ANOTHER A.A.DAR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.D.G. OF POLICE AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1033/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: JKHC010021162026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1609/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1033/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAZILA FAYAZ MIR AND ANOTHER A.A.DAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.D.G. OF POLICE AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/1033/2026 Outcome: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to police to provide adequate protection. Two adult petitioners—Nazila Fayaz Mir (18) and Suhail Hamed Dar (21)—sought protection from police after marrying consensually on March 20, 2026, fearing violence from relatives who opposed the marriage. The High Court of J&K granted their petition, directing police authorities to provide adequate security under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, recognizing adults' fundamental right to choose life partners. The Court clarified this order doesn't authenticate the marriage or age/majority, which remain subject to applicable law, and permitted police to investigate any FIR filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1033/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/1033/2026 Outcome: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to police to provide adequate protection. Two adult petitioners—Nazila Fayaz Mir (18) and Suhail Hamed Dar (21)—sought protection from police after marrying consensually on March 20, 2026, fearing violence from relatives who opposed the marriage. The High Court of J&K granted their petition, directing police authorities to provide adequate security under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, recognizing adults' fundamental right to choose life partners. The Court clarified this order doesn't authenticate the marriage or age/majority, which remain subject to applicable law, and permitted police to investigate any FIR filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case