NAZILA FAYAZ MIR AND ANOTHER A.A.DAR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.D.G. OF POLICE AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1033/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010021162026
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1609/2026
Filing Date
07-05-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1033/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAZILA FAYAZ MIR AND ANOTHER A.A.DAR
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.D.G. OF POLICE AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
Orders
Case Summary: WP(C)/1033/2026 Outcome: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to police to provide adequate protection. Two adult petitioners—Nazila Fayaz Mir (18) and Suhail Hamed Dar (21)—sought protection from police after marrying consensually on March 20, 2026, fearing violence from relatives who opposed the marriage. The High Court of J&K granted their petition, directing police authorities to provide adequate security under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, recognizing adults' fundamental right to choose life partners. The Court clarified this order doesn't authenticate the marriage or age/majority, which remain subject to applicable law, and permitted police to investigate any FIR filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP(C)/1033/2026 Outcome: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to police to provide adequate protection. Two adult petitioners—Nazila Fayaz Mir (18) and Suhail Hamed Dar (21)—sought protection from police after marrying consensually on March 20, 2026, fearing violence from relatives who opposed the marriage. The High Court of J&K granted their petition, directing police authorities to provide adequate security under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, recognizing adults' fundamental right to choose life partners. The Court clarified this order doesn't authenticate the marriage or age/majority, which remain subject to applicable law, and permitted police to investigate any FIR filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts