M/S AMCO IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRIES TH.PROP BAKHAT PARVAIZ AND SAIF vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1031/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC010021132026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C)/1606/2026

Filing Date

07-05-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1031/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

LEASE AND GOVT. CONTRACTS ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

M/S AMCO IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRIES TH.PROP BAKHAT PARVAIZ AND SAIF

Respondent(s)

UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

08-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION FRESH

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Case Summary: WP(C) 1031/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the writ petition by converting it into a representation, directing respondent No. 2 (Rural Development) to consider the petitioner's claim within four weeks. The court mandated that due weightage be given to a 2014 SICOP communication acknowledging the petitioner's admitted payment of Rs. 2,38,484 for executed works, with the final decision to be communicated via registered post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1031/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the writ petition by converting it into a representation, directing respondent No. 2 (Rural Development) to consider the petitioner's claim within four weeks. The court mandated that due weightage be given to a 2014 SICOP communication acknowledging the petitioner's admitted payment of Rs. 2,38,484 for executed works, with the final decision to be communicated via registered post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case