UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION BANDIPORA (POLICE / HOME) JAHINGEER AHMAD DAR vs MOHAMMAD SUBHAN SHEIKH — CRM(M)/287/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010021022026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/504/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/287/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF PROCESS/PROCEEDING. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION BANDIPORA (POLICE / HOME) JAHINGEER AHMAD DAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD SUBHAN SHEIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir modified the trial court's order dismissing the prosecution's application to examine two additional witnesses (PW-7: Executive Magistrate and PW-8: FSL Expert) under Section 540 CrPC in FIR No. 59/2012. Finding these witnesses material to the prosecution's case and that no prejudice would result to the accused, the court allowed the prosecution one opportunity to examine them on a date fixed by the trial court, with the condition that if this opportunity is not availed, the trial shall proceed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/287/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir modified the trial court's order dismissing the prosecution's application to examine two additional witnesses (PW-7: Executive Magistrate and PW-8: FSL Expert) under Section 540 CrPC in FIR No. 59/2012. Finding these witnesses material to the prosecution's case and that no prejudice would result to the accused, the court allowed the prosecution one opportunity to examine them on a date fixed by the trial court, with the condition that if this opportunity is not availed, the trial shall proceed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case