GHULAM MOHD GANIE AND OTHERS IMTIYAZ AHMAD RATHER AND BILAL AHMAD RATHER vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS — CRM(M)/285/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020992026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/502/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/285/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

PETITION U/S 561A CR.PC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM MOHD GANIE AND OTHERS IMTIYAZ AHMAD RATHER AND BILAL AHMAD RATHER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM(M) 285/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' plea to quash FIR No. 58/2026. The petitioners, involved in a civil land dispute with Abdul Ahad Wani, alleged false criminal implication after police enforced a civil court's status quo order on disputed property. The court found prima facie evidence of offences—stone pelting, assault on police, obstruction of government work, and criminal force against officials—and rejected the quashing petition, holding the allegations originated from the police enforcement operation, not from civil dispute enmity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM(M) 285/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' plea to quash FIR No. 58/2026. The petitioners, involved in a civil land dispute with Abdul Ahad Wani, alleged false criminal implication after police enforced a civil court's status quo order on disputed property. The court found prima facie evidence of offences—stone pelting, assault on police, obstruction of government work, and criminal force against officials—and rejected the quashing petition, holding the allegations originated from the police enforcement operation, not from civil dispute enmity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case