MOHAMMAD SALEEM WANI MR. ASWAD R. ATTAR, M. RAFIQ vs MANZOOR AHMAD MIR — CRM(M)/279/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020922026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/499/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/279/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD SALEEM WANI MR. ASWAD R. ATTAR, M. RAFIQ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANZOOR AHMAD MIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's Section 528 BNSS petition challenging the earlier order dismissing the respondent's revision petition as withdrawn. The petitioner, who had secured a conviction and Rs. 13,24,160 compensation against the respondent in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case, contended that the revision petition was withdrawn due to a compromise between parties which was not reflected in the dismissal order. The Court held the petitioner had no standing to challenge the dismissal since only the respondent was affected by it, and the conviction order remained final and executable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's Section 528 BNSS petition challenging the earlier order dismissing the respondent's revision petition as withdrawn. The petitioner, who had secured a conviction and Rs. 13,24,160 compensation against the respondent in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case, contended that the revision petition was withdrawn due to a compromise between parties which was not reflected in the dismissal order. The Court held the petitioner had no standing to challenge the dismissal since only the respondent was affected by it, and the conviction order remained final and executable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case