KOOL KARS TH.ITS PROP BHAT FAYAZ AHMAD vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.(TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER SRINAGAR/JAMMU) AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1022/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020882026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1590/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1022/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

TRANSPORT MATTERS ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOOL KARS TH.ITS PROP BHAT FAYAZ AHMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.(TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER SRINAGAR/JAMMU) AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

    Summary of WP(C) 1022/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition after the Transport Commissioner's blanket ban on sleeper coach operations on the Udhampur-Ramban-Banihal National Highway stretch was kept in abeyance by Government Order dated 6 May 2026. The court directed respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's vehicles operating under validly issued route permits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1022/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(C) 1022/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition after the Transport Commissioner's blanket ban on sleeper coach operations on the Udhampur-Ramban-Banihal National Highway stretch was kept in abeyance by Government Order dated 6 May 2026. The court directed respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's vehicles operating under validly issued route permits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case